Oklahoma’s public schools are facing a serious challenge that has nothing to do with teaching quality or student performance—chronic absenteeism. Under the Oklahoma State Report Card system, schools are graded based on a range of factors, including attendance. While the intent behind measuring chronic absenteeism is understandable, its impact on schools is problematic, particularly when the causes of absenteeism are often beyond educators’ control.

One major issue is the economic reality many Oklahoma families face. Nearly 20% of children in the state live in poverty, meaning many students struggle with unstable housing, food insecurity and lack of transportation. Should the school be punished if a student cannot get to school due to a lack of a reliable ride? The state’s grading system does not account for these challenges, making it harder for schools in lower-income areas to achieve high ratings.
Illness and mental health are also significant concerns. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, schools encourage students to stay home when sick to prevent outbreaks. Additionally, anxiety and depression among young people contribute to missed school days. Instead of supporting schools in addressing these issues, the state’s grading system penalizes them for prioritizing student well-being.
Disciplinary policies further complicate the issue. Schools are required to suspend students for certain behaviors, even when alternative interventions might be more effective. This creates a paradox: schools must follow state discipline guidelines yet are penalized when suspensions contribute to absenteeism rates.

Instead of focusing so heavily on chronic absenteeism, why not change the report card system to include factors that schools can control? Metrics such as discipline referrals, dropout rates and access to extracurricular programs could provide a more comprehensive and fair assessment of school performance. These elements directly impact student success and allow schools to take meaningful action for improvement.
The Oklahoma State Report Card should be a tool for improvement, not a weapon that unfairly labels struggling schools. If we truly care about student success, we must rethink how we measure attendance and provide the necessary support to ensure all students can be present and engaged in their education. Holding schools accountable for chronic absenteeism without addressing root causes is not just unfair—it’s counterproductive.

To learn more about how local schools are addressing chronic absenteeism, read the second installment of our What’s Right with Our Schools series. In this article, two public school districts in the Oklahoma City metro area highlight common challenges and innovative solutions to help get kids back into the classroom.


